Accounting.
Mar. 17th, 2026 09:09 pmIt's probably just going to be a couple days' of Stardew Valley, though.
I’ve been on Tumblr since 2012 and I have never seen the code get reversed due to user rage before. The closest I can think of is when they took comments away for like a year and then put them back different. I’m very proud of all the yelling that got it done but this is wildly (and honestly a little suspiciously) out of character. Is my memory failing me? Can anyone name another time this has happened?
I never even saw the “new” format except in screengrabs. I suspect I’m on some weird segmented server because I almost always get the site changes either way ahead of everyone else or way behind, and this was no exception. Y'all killed the beast so fast I never even saw it. I’m certainly not mad about it but I am waiting for a second shoe to drop.
But Tumblr says this will build engagement; and Tumblr is an honorable site.
(feel free to reblog this any way you want, if you want.)
Friends, tumblerinas, feigalach of all kinds, lend me your ears. I come to mourn the reblog chain, not to praise her
The good that features do, is mentioned after them. Their frustrating parts are oft intered with their bones, so let it be, with the reblog chain
The noble tumblr hath told you the reblog chain denied engagement. If it were so, it was a grievous fault, and grievously hath the reblog chain paid for it
Here, under leave of tumblr and its @staff, for tumblr is an honorable site, so are its @staff, honorable in their help, come I to speak, at the reblog chain’s final moments
She was a good feature. Simple, and engaging to me, but tumblr says she denied engagement and tumblr is an honorable site
She had brought many memes to the world, who’s sharing did the userbase grow, did this, in the reblog chain, deny engagement?
When that the meme did flop, the reblog chain had not notes! Engagement denial should be made of lesser stuff, yet tumblr says she denied engagement and tumblr is an honorable site
You all did see that in the last 3 years thrice users of other sites flocked to it, and thrice they had not stayed because opening Tumblr for the first time sucks, and absolutely never for the reblog chain, but tumblr says she did deny engagement, and Tumblr, is an honorable site
I speak not to disprove what tumblr spoke, but here I am to speak what I do know.
You all did love her once, not without cause: What cause withholds you then, to mourn for her? O judgment! thou art fled to brutish beasts, And @changes have lost their reason. Bear with me; my heart is in the coffin there with the reblog chain, and I must pause till it come back to me.
i do appreciate the way that we tumblr users have evolved our language to discuss our feelings related to The Character/The Guy. you used to have to just say he was hot or he was making your ovaries explode or he was a precious cinnamon roll even if he looked bad or was just kind of standing there or whatever. now you can say things like “the creature” or “he looks so sopping wet here” or “i want to chain him to my radiator” like it’s just more inclusive and adaptable to the situation
as someone on the asexual spectrum, this shift in language genuinely made me feel more comfortable and happy in fandom spaces. i’ve never once wanted to lick a man’s abs. i HAVE wanted to chain a man to my radiator. and that’s beautiful.
Aw, as Hodag illustrations go that one's pretty adorable! I like that it's kind of a cute cryptid, that's why I picked it, although admittedly Wisconsin cryptids are a little thin on the ground to start with. And I'm already stealing the schtick from @thebibliosphere and @mothman-etd so I couldn't go with Mothman.
It's a shame Rhinelander, the "home" of the hodag, is so far north -- my Hodag can't travel super far (it's why they haven't visited me in Chicago and we're trying to work out if they can make the roughly 2 1/2 hour drive from Milwaukee to Spring Green this summer) or I'd suggest we go pay a visit.


I do wish that polls wouldn't ask if people thought that the PM was handling something "Well" or "Badly". Because two people answering "Badly" might mean completely different things by it.
Also, me saying "Immigration is important to me" means the opposite of what a Reform voter would mean by it.
This because of reporting of how many people think that Starmer is handling the Iran situation well or badly. When I can guarantee that some of the "badly" think we should be bombing Iran right now, and some think that we shouldn't be involved even slightly.